Ruby on Rails Vs. Node.js: The Ultimate Noob Guide for Startups

Posted by Priyanka Sharma · November 11, 2021 · 11 Min read

Statistics have shown that the hardest decision for a startup has to do with choosing a technology or language to use.

However, in the midst of this dilemma, the top most popular languages and frameworks, Ruby on Rails and Node.js tend to have a huge debate as to which is better for startups.

In this blog, we will have a look at the comparison of RoR vs Node JS, together with the attributes of these two technologies. You’ll see the reason for this argument so that startups in this kind of situation can easily make a quick decision.

Ruby on Rails

Ruby is an object-oriented language that sums up important features of other languages, while Rails is an application framework built around the Ruby language. Ruby on Rails has quite a number of benefits that make it appealing for startups. These benefits are:

  • rapid application development
  • good code quality
  • large community
  • design-friendly
  • saves time and effort
  • enables you to write fewer codes
  • has good libraries

Pros of Ruby on Rails

Pros of Ruby on Rails

Startups tend to go for Ruby on Rails development not just because of the benefits, but the pros as well. Here are the pros/advantages of using Rails:

  • cost-effective as you tend to spend less
  • easy to code which applies also to refactoring codes
  • fast delivery process from initial idea to users, and saves your time and money
  • suitable for all business

Cons of Ruby on Rails

It is often said that whatever has a good side always has its downside. It will be unfair to look into the benefits and pros of Ruby on Rails without talking about its cons.

  • runtime speed of Rails is very slow, as compared to other languages
  • multithreading leads to performance issues
  • boot speed is slow and takes more time than usual to start
  • Active Record as your domain becomes tightly coupled with your persistence mechanism
  • usually hard to find good documentation


Node.js is an open-source platform for executing JavaScript code server-side, as it was built on the JavaScript runtime. With the help of an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model, Node.js tends to be more efficient and lightweight. Node.js has its advantages and disadvantages. Further, we will see its pros and cons.

Node.js Pros:

Node.js Pros and cons
  • full package from HTTP server to templating engine
  • client and server side has the same language
  • simple to deploy, monitor, and provide support for
  • page loading is faster
  • high demand rate in the market
  • powerful underlying libraries

Node.js Cons:

  • not suitable for intensive processor tasks
  • unstable API
  • does not have a standard library
  • most of the codes will have a JavaScript problem
  • requires the Asynchronous Programming Model, which many developers find more difficult

Background and Purpose of Node.js and Ruby on Rails

Node.js is not a language, but a runtime environment that lets users convert client-side code to server-side. Node converts JavaScript into machine code that can be easily processed by the hardware. The framework is based on Chrome V8 Engine. It’s one of the fast engines out there, which contributes to runtime’s high conversion speed.

Ruby on Rails is a website development framework. Rails are created to help manage routine, internal logic, data computing, etc. Ruby on Rails is known for its code efficiency and high speed. What takes dozens of lines in Java can be done on Ruby with 5-10 lines.

Where is It Better to Use Node.js?

Node.js is a command-line environment that allows running the same JS code that you are writing for the front-end. It allows sharing code with the backend and browser and handling multiple operations at a time. Let’s see how these advantages come in handy in different aspects of web development using Node.js.

Server-side development

Node is good at establishing reliable communication between the server and the browser. It uses a long-polling technique that allows applications to handle multiple incoming requests simultaneously. Node.js doesn’t wait for all queries to be processed to start handling new incoming ones.

This makes Node.js well-suited to real-time apps: messengers, online games, real-time collaboration platforms, chatrooms. The possibility of using JavaScript both at the front end and backend will make development faster and easier. If you previously worked with JS, learning Node.js for the backend will not be a problem.

API development

Node.js is a go-to language for REST API development. Representational State Transfer — this is what REST stands for. It’s an architecture that allows users to quickly get output to their web requests. The basic principles of REST development are to be uniform, stateless, client-server, have a layered system, offer a cacheable architecture, and respond on-demand.

REST APIs are incredibly practical in web development. Whenever a user is looking for something, a web app uses REST API to deliver source results. REST APIs connect the user’s input to the software’s code, opening a channel for communication. Node.js, with its fast request processing speed and JS tech stack, is an obvious first choice for REST API development.


Node.js’ architecture fits perfectly with the structure of microservices. Its non-blocking request processing algorithms and event-driven approach allow us to connect multiple services and process hundreds of internal requests at the same time. Microservices need to communicate all the time, which is why assuring fast data processing is highly important.

Both microservice architecture and Node.js focus on speed and efficiency. The entire point of a microservice architecture is to let developers build well-performing and scalable platforms by breaking functionality down into manageable services. Node.js helps bring this to life with a fast V8 engine and non-blocking processing.

Companies that use Node.js

Companies switch to Node.js because of its performance and responsiveness. Node.js is currently used by LinkedIn, Uber, Medium, New York Times, and Hapi. For some companies, a transition to Node.js is coupled with a switch to the microservice architecture.

For instance, Netflix decentralized its web platform and used Node.js as the main backend tool in the process. This led to the app’s bigger scalability and responsiveness. A similar thing was done by PayPal’s development team. The company used Node during prototyping and development — and the team reports an incredible increase in the team’s efficiency and app’s performance speed.

The Problem with Node.js

Node.js is by no means a perfect backend tool. JavaScript is still a front-end tool that is not adapted to certain aspects of server-side development. By design, it’s not suited for backend functionality. Node.js has to compensate for JS’s inability to work on server-side and as a result, offers a somewhat limited experience — here’s why.

Processor consuming tasks for Node.js applications

Node.js is a single-thread language, which means it will process one request at a time unless you develop them up as a series of events. When we are talking about fast operations, Node.js executes them quickly. However, as soon as we are talking about time-consuming functions, Node does not treat it as an event. A single long-term operation will block all the others.

Obviously, such an approach leads to high CPU consumption and a dramatic decrease in speed. So, many Node.js advantages are relevant as soon as you don’t overburden the app with consuming tasks. When you cross that line, Node.js loses many of its positives.

Security issues are difficult to tackle

Node.js is known for its large ecosystem. The open-source package management system provides developers with reusable code, plugins, add-on, increasing the versatility of the application.

Node.js are full of npm packages — using ready components saves time and potentially improves the code quality. However, not all teams understand the dangers associated with npm packages. The problem is, the Node.js team only recently began scanning modules for security issues. Many of the current npm packages which include tough-cookie, js.dom, and others have dependencies, vulnerabilities, and room for potential security threats.

Where is It Preferable to Use Ruby on Rails?

Ruby on Rails is used as a backend framework for web applications. It’s known for efficiency and scalability. You can write rich functionality with much fewer lines of code as opposed to what you’d need in Java or Node.js.

Full-stack web application

Ruby on Rails is a highly structured framework for a web app. Rails have a lot of rules on how the code has to be organized. The framework uses the Model, View, Controller framework. To get an app to respond to a request, you need to define a view, controller, and route. Getting started with an MVC framework is time-consuming, but in the end, the code is well-organized and easy to read. In the end, you’ll end up with an efficient code that’s easy to maintain and edit.

Content management systems

Ruby on Rails is not yet the universal top choice for content management system development. PHP is still the go-to choice, but Ruby on Rails entered the field recently, and it offers a lot of competitive advantages. Ruby on Rails allows quickly writing rich functionality due to high abstraction levels. You can map entire tables and databases as separate objects. You can refer to a big chunk of functionality with several lines of code.


Ruby on Rails allows writing code fast and implementing built-in features, available in the ecosystem. When you are working on the minimally viable version of a product, you don’t need ultimate speed and interface — the main priority is operational efficiency and well-organized development processes. Ruby on Rails offers multiple command-line code builders, letting developers avoid writing code from scratch. Coupled with open source libraries, this ready-to-use code can accommodate more than half of the functionality.

The Problem with Ruby on Rails

Many developers wonder: seeing how productive the process of writing on Ruby and Ruby on Rails is, how come both the language and its framework aren’t more popular? Well, even though the language definitely wins in efficiency, its performance reputation isn’t quite that stellar.

Performance speed

If we compare the speed of Ruby on Rails vs Node.js, even experienced Ruby on Rails developers acknowledge that the framework is slow. While its speed improves with every version, it’s still a lot lower than Node’s. There are many reasons for the performance delay.

Ruby is an interpreted tool, which means the code is not compiled into a machine version. Therefore, it’s harder for hardware to read and process quickly.

Node offers the Just In Time compilation which allows turning JS code into a bycode instead of a machine language. Cutting off an additional conversion step increases the application’s performance speed. Ruby, in comparison, introduced JIT only in recent versions, and it’s far from perfect — if anything, current JIT slows code processing down.

Ruby offers a way to write multiple threads, so the problem of handling CPU-intensive tasks isn’t as drastic as with Node. Still, when comparing Ruby on Rails vs. Node.js performance, Rails won’t be your top choice.

Garbage collection ineffectiveness

It’s a known fact that garbage-collected languages tend to be slower. All of a sudden, developers might see a sudden spike of memory usage in their apps and a drastic drop in the performance speed. The more you scale the application, the more memory each iteration of the garbage collector will use.

In Ruby, GC.disable will stop garbage collection. There are also libraries for handling garbage-collector-related memory leaks, but they mostly act as a temporary solution.

No Static Typing System

When we compare Ruby to Node.js, the lack of a static typing system is one of the most noticeable drawbacks. In Node.js, TypeScript allows integrated features that aren’t natively supported by JS. These features are written and displayed as typical JavaScript variables. There’s no difference in how the language treats its native and non-native components.

TypeScript is a must-use for increasing code reliability, facilitating the communication between teams, documenting development. It also allows using specific features for increasing the app’s compatibility with particular browsers. You can type code, organize features, and build new functionality. In Ruby, all these features don’t exist.


It is not that easy to choose a tech stack for a startup.

Startups have to consider looking into their business model and analyzing the pros and cons of both technologies, which means making a decision is by preference.

Both Node JS and Ruby on Rails can help you achieve the same results, but Rails is perfect when you want to move at a high pace. When building your application, the language or framework doesn’t really matter, but the execution is important. Analyze the pros and cons features and then get started. Which of the two teach stacks you would prefer, let us know in the comments.

Share this Article